Calorie Burn — Jump Rope
Estimate calories burned skipping rope from body weight, session time, and skipping cadence.
What this tool does
This calculator estimates rope-skipping energy expenditure using cadence-banded MET values from the Adult Compendium of Physical Activities. It multiplies body weight, time, and the MET for the selected cadence: slow skipping under 100 skips per minute at 8.3 METs (code 15552), moderate 100–120 skips per minute at 11.8 METs (code 15551), fast 120–160 skips per minute at 12.3 METs (code 15550), and double unders at 10.0 METs (code 15554). Secondary rows show the MET, the net-of-resting figure, and the per-minute rate.
Formula Used
Disclaimer
This calculator is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not provide medical, nutritional, or training advice. Results are mathematical estimates and may not reflect individual circumstances. Consult a qualified coach, registered dietitian, medical professional, or physiotherapist for personal guidance.
How the jump rope estimate works
Rope skipping is one of the few activities the Compendium bands by movement cadence rather than by subjective effort. The calculator multiplies MET × body mass (kg) × hours using four published entries: slow skipping below 100 skips per minute at 8.3 METs (code 15552), moderate skipping at 100–120 skips per minute with a plain two-foot bounce at 11.8 METs (code 15551), fast skipping at 120–160 skips per minute at 12.3 METs (code 15550), and double unders at 10.0 METs (code 15554). Cadence is countable — a 30-second count doubled — which makes the band choice unusually objective for a MET table.
The formula, worked through
A 75 kg skipper holding a moderate 110 skips per minute for 15 minutes: 11.8 × 75 × 0.25 = 221.25, rounded to 221 kcal, or 14.8 kcal per minute. Net of resting the figure is 203 kcal. Fifteen continuous minutes is a serious volume — roughly 1,650 rope turns without a miss.
A second scenario
An 80 kg boxer doing fast-cadence work for 10 minutes accumulates 12.3 × 80 × (10/60) = 164 kcal. At the other end, a 75 kg beginner practising slow skipping for 30 minutes — with the rope stopping and restarting — is priced at 8.3 × 75 × 0.5 = 311 kcal, though real beginners rarely keep the rope turning for the full clock, a point covered below.
Why even slow skipping rates 8.3 METs
Skipping has no glide phase. Every turn requires a jump, and even a low 90-per-minute cadence means 90 takeoffs per minute with calves, quads, shoulders, and forearms all working. That floor of continuous ballistic effort is why the slow entry starts at a MET most activities never reach. The narrow spread between slow (8.3) and fast (12.3) is equally notable: doubling cadence does not double cost, because jump height typically falls as turn rate rises.
Double unders: harder move, lower average
The double-under entry at 10.0 METs sits below fast single skipping, which surprises many athletes. The resolution is duty cycle: double-under work is usually performed in sets with pauses between attempts, and the higher jump partially offsets the slower rotation, so the measured session average lands under continuous 120–160 cadence bouncing. A skipper who genuinely strings continuous double unders for minutes at a time is outrunning the published average.
The stopped-rope problem
MET entries assume the activity is actually happening. Rope training is uniquely interruption-prone — a caught rope stops the work entirely, and practice sessions for beginners can be half standing time. Timing only the skipping (many rope timers count jumps, and jumps ÷ cadence gives true work minutes) keeps the estimate honest. Applying the band MET to a 20-minute session that contained 10 minutes of turning roughly doubles the real figure.
Gross versus net
The headline value includes the resting baseline; the net row prices only the increment over sitting still — 203 versus 221 kcal in the worked example. At 11.8 METs the resting share is small, one reason short rope sessions compare so favourably with longer moderate cardio for equal calorie totals.
Disclaimer
This tool is intended for educational and informational purposes only. It is not medical, clinical, or training advice and does not replace consultation with a physician, registered dietitian, or certified coach. All calculations return population-derived estimates that may differ from individual measured values.
Questions
- How do I know my skipping cadence?
- Count skips for 30 seconds and double the number, or use a counting rope or app that logs total jumps — total jumps divided by minutes gives the average cadence directly. Casual two-foot bouncing typically lands between 100 and 120 skips per minute, which is the 11.8 MET band. Cadences below 100 usually mean deliberate slow work or frequent rope stops, and above 130 requires practised technique.
- Why is jump rope's calorie rate so high compared with jogging?
- Skipping has no coasting phase — every rope turn demands a takeoff, and the arms and shoulders add continuous work that leg-only locomotion lacks. At a moderate 11.8 METs, rope work costs a 75 kg person about 14.8 kcal per minute, comparable to running near 12 km/h. The catch is sustainability: most people can jog for far longer than they can keep a rope turning, so per-session totals often favour the run.
- Why do double unders score a lower MET than fast skipping?
- The 10.0 MET double-under entry reflects how the skill is actually performed: in sets with recovery pauses between attempts, since few athletes sustain continuous double unders for minutes. The pauses drag the session average below continuous fast bouncing at 12.3 METs, even though each individual double-under jump costs more than a single. Athletes stringing long unbroken double-under sets exceed the published average.
- Should the timer include the breaks when the rope catches?
- The published values assume the rope is turning, so the honest input is turning time only. Beginner sessions are interruption-heavy — a 20-minute practice block can contain 10 minutes of actual skipping — and pricing the full block at the band MET roughly doubles the estimate. Jump-count divided by cadence recovers true work minutes when a counting rope or app is available.
- Does rope weight change the calorie estimate?
- The Compendium bands were measured with ordinary speed ropes and do not distinguish rope mass. Weighted ropes (450 g and up) measurably raise arm and shoulder work at a given cadence, so their true cost sits somewhat above the band value, though published measurements suggest the increment is modest relative to the jumping itself. Selecting the next cadence band up is a rough acknowledgement when training with a heavy rope.
Sources & Methodology
Calories = MET × body mass (kg) × duration (hours). MET values from the Adult Compendium of Physical Activities (2024): rope jumping, slow pace, <100 skips/min, two-foot skip, rhythm bounce = 8.3 METs (code 15552); rope jumping, moderate pace, 100–120 skips/min, two-foot skip, plain bounce = 11.8 METs (code 15551); rope jumping, fast pace, 120–160 skips/min = 12.3 METs (code 15550); rope jumping, double under or more = 10.0 METs (code 15554). Net figure = (MET − 1) × mass × hours.
- › Herrmann SD, et al. 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities: a third update of the energy costs of human activities. J Sport Health Sci. 2024;13(1):6–12.
- › Ainsworth BE, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1575–1581.
- › Jetté M, Sidney K, Blümchen G. Metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise testing, exercise prescription, and evaluation of functional capacity. Clin Cardiol. 1990;13(8):555–565.
Spotted something off?
Calculations or display — let us know.
More in Energy Expenditure
View all 18 →- Calorie Burn — CyclingEstimate calorie burn during cycling using speed-bracketed MET values and body weight.
- Calorie Burn — RunningEstimate calories burned during a run based on body weight, pace, and session duration.
- Calorie Burn — SwimmingEstimate swimming energy expenditure using MET values, body weight, and session duration.
- Calorie Burn — WalkingEstimate calories burned walking at different paces using research-backed MET values.
- Activity Calorie Comparison CalculatorCompare estimated calorie burn across running, cycling, swimming, walking, and resistance training.
- Calorie Burn — BoxingEstimate calories burned in boxing training from body weight, session time, and training mode.